Numéraire
Volume the Fourteenth · of the table of twenty-six
The Institutions · Group IV · № 14 · Fm

The Firm

planning inside the market

The firm is the first of the institutions, and the strangest object in a market economy: an island of central planning in a sea of prices. The families before this one studied the price and then its failures — the four frontiers where the great coordinator breaks down. This family studies what rises in its place: the institutions, the scaffolding on which a market that cannot stand alone is raised, and the firm is the first of them because it is the most fundamental. For consider the puzzle that founds the subject. If the price coordinates production so well — if the market, left to itself, guides each resource to its best use without anyone in charge — why is so much of the economy not run by the market at all, but by command, inside firms, where the price is switched off and a manager directs by authority what no price was allowed to touch? The volume's question is exactly that: if markets are so efficient, why is so much run by command inside firms? Its twelve plates follow the answer from the founding puzzle, through the boundary that decides what a firm makes and what it buys, the contracts and agency that bind it, and the ownership that governs it, to a discovery that overturns the great dichotomy of the age: that the firm is planning, alive and everywhere, inside the market — and that the choice was never between the price and the plan, but only ever where to draw the line between them.

in print · № XIV · 12 of 12 plates
← The complete table of volumes

The argument of the volume

Begin where the subject began, with a question so simple it had to wait until 1937 to be asked. The market, the price families taught, is a marvel of coordination: no one plans it, yet it feeds cities, and the price guides each good to its highest use as if by an invisible hand. Why, then, are there firms? Why is production not organized entirely through the market — each worker a contractor selling his labor by the task, each step of making a thing a separate purchase at a quoted price — so that the whole economy is one seamless web of spot exchanges, coordinated wholly by price? Instead we find great islands where the price does not reach: inside a firm, the assembler does not buy the half-built car from the welder and sell it to the painter; he is told what to do by a manager, and the car moves down the line by plan, by direction, by authority, not by price at all. The firm is a patch of planned economy inside the market, and its very existence is a reproach to the claim that the price coordinates best — for if it did, why would anyone ever replace it with a boss?

Coase's answer was that using the market is not free. To coordinate by price, one must discover what the prices are, find the right counterpart, negotiate the terms, write the contract, guard against the cheat — and all of this costs time, effort, and money, the transaction costs of using the market. Where these costs are small, the market is used, and the thing is bought. But where they are large — where the prices are hard to find, the counterpart hard to trust, the contract hard to write for every contingency — it becomes cheaper to dispense with the market and organize the activity by command instead, inside a firm, under a manager who simply directs. The firm exists, then, wherever the cost of using the price exceeds the cost of replacing it with authority; it is the institution that arises where the market is too expensive to use. And this same logic draws the firm's boundary, the line between what it makes and what it buys: the firm internalizes an activity when planning it is cheaper than purchasing it, and buys the activity when the market is cheaper than the plan — expanding until the cost of organizing one more thing inside equals the cost of buying that thing outside.

That the firm replaces the price with the plan raises a question larger than the firm, and the volume builds toward it. If planning is cheaper than the market for some activities, why not for all — why not organize the whole economy as one great firm, a single plan, as the command economies tried to do? And if the market is cheaper for some, why not for all — why have firms at all, rather than a pure web of contracts? The answer, the volume will find, is that neither the price nor the plan is cheapest everywhere: each has its domain, set by the costs of coordinating, and the firm is precisely the institution that draws the boundary between them, activity by activity, choosing the price where it is cheap and the plan where it is not. So the great dichotomy of the twentieth century — market against plan, capitalism against socialism — was always a false one: every economy is a mixture, every firm a little plan inside the market, and the only real question is where the line between them falls, and what moves it. The firm is where that line is drawn — and the rest of this family, the contract and the money and the tax and the rule, are the other institutions by which a market, unable to stand on the price alone, is held up.

The argument remains open. What follows is an attempt to fix its exact edges.

The twelve plates of this volume

  1. i The Islandin print Coase's puzzle and answer: why firms exist at all when the market could do the work — because using the price is not free, and where its costs run high, command is cheaper than exchange. Read the plate →
  2. ii The Entrepreneurin print Knight; the firm as the bearer of uncertainty, the entrepreneur who guarantees the wage and claims the residual, and profit as the reward for shouldering the risk no one could price. Read the plate →
  3. iii The Holdupin print Williamson; asset specificity and the hold-up it invites, and the make-or-buy line — the firm swallowing the transactions that the market, by exposing them to a partner's mercy, would govern badly. Read the plate →
  4. iv The Nexusin print the firm as a web of contracts rather than a thing with an inside — with workers, lenders, suppliers, owners — and the agency cost that each such bond, joining parties whose interests diverge, must carry. Read the plate →
  5. v The Ownerin print Grossman and Hart; ownership as the residual right to decide all that the contract did not, and make-or-buy as the question of who should hold that right over which assets. Read the plate →
  6. vi The Employeein print Simon; the employment relation, and the wage that buys not a single named task but the open-ended agreement to be directed within a zone the worker does not negotiate. Read the plate →
  7. vii The Shareholderin print Berle and Means; the separation of ownership from control in the great corporation, the owners who do not manage and the managers who do not own, and the apparatus that would align them. Read the plate →
  8. viii The Planin print the deepest turn: the firm as planning inside the market, the visible hand where the invisible fails — and the discovery that market against plan was always a false choice, the firm a moving frontier between them set by the cost of coordinating. Read the plate →
  9. ix The Charterin print the corporation as a legal person — limited liability, transferable shares, and a life beyond its founders' — the legal invention that made the great firm possible to build and to finance. Read the plate →
  10. x The Divisionin print the multidivisional firm; how an organization too large for one mind to hold is split into divisions and made to act as one, and the internal market that allots its capital. Read the plate →
  11. xi The Cooperativein print the worker-owned firm, the partnership, the mutual; the alternatives to capital's ownership, and the puzzle of why capital so usually hires labor and so seldom the reverse. Read the plate →
  12. xii The Dissolutionin print the firm in the age of cheap markets; how outsourcing, the franchise, and the gig platform dissolve the firm as the cost of using the market falls — the moving frontier, caught in motion. Read the plate →

In closing

This volume opened the fourth family by taking up the first and strangest of the institutions: the firm, the island of central planning in the market's sea of prices. The families before it had honored the price and then mapped its failures; this one turns to what is built where the price cannot stand alone, and the firm is the first because it is the most fundamental — the institution that arises wherever using the market costs more than replacing it with command.

The volume traced the firm from its founding puzzle to its modern dissolution. Coase asked why firms exist when the market coordinates so well, and answered that the market is not free to use: where the transaction costs of discovering prices, striking bargains, and guarding contracts run high, it is cheaper to coordinate by authority, inside a firm, than by price, across a market. That same calculus draws the firm's boundary — make what is dear to buy, buy what is dear to make — and Williamson sharpened it: where a transaction requires investments specific to one partner, the parties are locked together and exposed to hold-up, and they integrate, bringing the hazardous exchange inside the firm. What the firm is made of, the volume found, is contracts — a nexus of them, binding owners, managers, and workers, each relation carrying its own agency cost as the interests of principal and agent diverge — and what governs it is ownership, which is at bottom the residual right to decide what the contracts left unsaid, assigned to whoever's investment most needs protecting. And in the largest firms that ownership comes apart from control: the residual claim is scattered among thousands of shareholders too dispersed to govern, while the governing falls to managers who own almost none of what they direct — so that the question of who truly commands the corporation reopens, and the apparatus of boards and share-based pay and hostile takeovers that would bend the managers back toward the owners is itself one more piece of the institution's scaffolding.

And then the volume turned on the firm in the largest frame, and found it to be the thing the great debate of the age had pronounced dead. The firm is a planned economy in miniature — an island where the price is switched off and resources move by command, by budget, by the visible hand of management. Most of a market economy, by volume, happens not in the open market between firms but inside firms, under planning; the sea of prices is mostly islands. So the twentieth century's choice between market and plan was a false one: every economy is a mixture of the two, and the firm is the institution that draws the line between them, activity by activity, by whichever coordinates more cheaply — the price where the market is cheap, the plan where it is dear. And the line moves: as the cost of using the market falls, with cheap information and easy contracting and the matching platform, the firm shrinks and outsources and dissolves, and the market reclaims what the plan had held; as that cost rises, the firm grows. The firm is a moving frontier, the living boundary between the price and the plan. With it the table turns from the price to the institutions that scaffold it — and the contract, the money, the tax, and the rule, the family's remaining members, are the other scaffolds by which a market, which the failures showed cannot stand on the price alone, is built up into an economy.

If the firm is planning inside the market, and the boundary between price and plan is drawn wherever each is cheaper, then the old question — markets or planning? — dissolves into a harder one: not which to choose, for we have always had both, but where, in this age and this trade, the line between them should fall. Where does the market end, and the plan begin?